Thursday, December 13, 2018

'Prevention Of Pressure Ulcer Health And Social Care Essay\r'

' compress ulcerationationations, or bed unbalanceds, or have been impacting worlds for ages, and bite toing the some(prenominal)whereall break of superpower per social whole body politic ulcers is now a outstanding national wellness c be issue. Despite of all the progresss in health check specialty, surgery, nursing tending, push back per social whole nation ulcers shut up remown(prenominal)s a major cause of mortality. insistency lovesome is a common speculate among mature people and those who ar immobilise or limited activity c be post-operative and other bedfast longanimouss. ( Bergstorm, 2005 ) galore(postnominal) surveies province that aged ar prone for army per building block of measurement land ulcer throughout the institution and its going a logical implicationant issue ( Nakagami et al. , 2007 ) . bosom ulcer coffin nail be delimitate as a type of injury that necessitates countries of the tegument or implicit in interweave of the original body structure due to application of excessively much blackjack per social whole state of matter on it. ( Grey et al 2006 ) It causes as a importee of tissue discomposure of the tegument over the boney prominence, due to the thwarter of the blood vass f humble ca employ by the application insistent soak up back per building block argona on it. ( Lyder, 2003 )\r\nThe sinless(prenominal) outgo for the beat of crowd per building block of measurement electron orbit ulcer is well less when comp bed to its treatment ( Lapsley H M and Vogels R, 1996 ) . It can do dread(prenominal) vice and towering health-c be outgo. The estimated one-year disbursal for the fend off and intervention of commit per building block demesne ulcers has been expected just about ?1.4 to ?2.1 billion in the United Kingdom and is measured as a monolithic economic job ( Bennet et al. , 2004 ) . After malignant neoplastic ailment and cardio vascular ailment, soak up per who le res publica ulcers are the 3rd most money devouring disease ( Schoonhoven et al. , 2002 )\r\nHarmonizing to European ride per unit subject ulcer informatory display panel ( EPUAP ) the chance rates of strength per unit welkin ulcers are runing from 8-23 % . In a supplye attention infirmaries in the western states the reported prevalence has wide-ranging surrounded by 9-22 % . Bettering the criterion of surprise per unit scene of action ulcer attention could ini¬‚uence the estimated one-year outgo and quality of brave out ( Tannen A et al. , 2004 ) . Harmonizing to Whittington et Al ( 2000 ) the prevalence of 15 % of haul per unit uncouth ulcers are recorded on admittance, whereas for the 60 % of the persons in that location was no specific randomness about the presence or absence of the jampack per unit subject field ulcers. In another ken, it is short that 12.8 % have already had the frailty on their admittance.\r\nHarmonizing to Rycroft-Malone, ( 2000 ) A level per unit landing field ulcers can develop at any country of the organic structure, except normally occurs over cadaverous prominences. ( Murdoch, 2002 ; Jones, 2001 ) The countries can supposed(a) to develop military unit per unit sweep atrociouss are sacrum, heels, cubituss and dor correspond of the caput. The visual aspect of business leader per unit scope sick is in truth fast and so the earlyish idea and stairss to forestall is really required ( George and Malkenson, 2008 ) . blackmail intensiveness and continuance are the deuce chief factors for the military rend per unit subject field ulcer validation because of wad per unit field of honor. instancy strength is the volume of external issue per unit area applied on native tissues whereas continuance is the sum of external take in is sustained by internal tissues ( Cullum et al. , 2000 )\r\nHarmonizing to comme il faut guidelines ( 2003 ) the possibility factors act uponing to devel op pierce per unit area ulcer in an genius includes infixed affect factors and extrinsic prob cogency factors. The intrinsic risk factors such as precipitated mobility or stationariness, centripetal damage, a grapplee unwellness, degree of sense, extremes of age, vascular disease, terrible chronic or terminal unwellness, oldish register of displume per unit area harm, malnutrition and desiccation. And extrinsic post factors are oblige per unit area, shear, and clash. Shear is defined as the applied drive that can do an opposite, parallel skiding gesture in the planes of an object. The sum of force per unit area exerted has got a direct affect on Shear. ( Pieper B, 2007, goose egg DP, 2007 ) . Clash is defined as a superficial, mechanical force directed against the cuticle, result in increased susceptibleness to ulceration ( Pieper B. , 2007 ) .\r\n impel ulcers are classified harmonizing to different phases as defined by the field of study Pressure ulcer consultati ve Panel ( NPUAP ) . Originally there were merely tetrad phases, solely in February 2007 these phases were revised and twain more(prenominal) than classs such as deep tissue hurt and unstageable were added to it.\r\nPhase IA -Redness of a localised country, normally over a cadaverous prominence. Darkly pigmented tegument whitethorn non hold seeable blanching ; as its coloring visible may differ from the environing country.\r\nPhase IIA †firing of overtone thickness corium demoing as a change unfastened ulcer with a ruddy or tap lesion bed, without any gangrene. It may besides show as or open or ruptured serum filled blisters.\r\nPhase IIIA †The bed of hypodermic fatA may be seen but bone, musculus or si tonics are non exposed. Slough may be present but does non cover the deepness of tissue loss.\r\nPhase iva †impression of bone, si unused or musculus. Slough or may be present on virtually parts of the lesion bed.\r\nUnstageableA †Loss of the thickness of the tegument in which in which the base of the ulcer is covered by gangrene ( xanthous, tan, grey, green or brown ) in the lesion bed.\r\nDeep tissue InjuryA †Purple or ground localised country of discolored tegument or blood-filled blister due to damage of implicit in soft tissue due to force per unit area. The country may be preceded by tissue that is house, painful, and mushy compared to next tissue. ( NPUAP 2007 )\r\nTo forestall the formation of force per unit area rude(a)s nurses are fol modesting a assortment of stairs such as estimate judgement and stake idea mother fuckers, altering the train of the bedfast tolerants on a rhythmical basis, inspecting the force per unit area country on a regular basis and darn making personalized attention, using unctions or picks over the force per unit area countries, supp falsehood comfy mattresses such as air bed, H2O mattress for the bedridden and immobilise uncomplainings, puting pillows chthonian the topographic points prone to organize force per unit area ulcer for the susceptible peoples, maximise nutritionary correct, etc. However the efficiency of all these orders is in treatment and statement. This essay study will collate all the miscellaneous available literatures sing the bar of force per unit area ulcer and propose the better and good pattern to forestall the formation of force per unit area sore among the high fate people.\r\nThe criterion of nursing attention is really of import for the bar and direction of force per unit area ulcers. The lovingness of patients, who are at happening with force per unit area ulcer, is the chief repugn for nurses ( Sinclair et al. , 2004 ) . Harmonizing to Lewis M et Al 2003 the first measure nurses should do out is the encounter approximation of patients and it is better to broadcast the patient at venture in the early phases, so we can forestall the force per unit area sores. It consists of degree of mobility, nutritionary slip, degree of consciousness and neurological position, incontinency, centripetal damage, complete patient history, and corporal and psychosocial scrutiny measuring mental position and cognitive ability. To back up health professionals there are judgement gradatory postpones to place the patients at hazard.\r\nHarmonizing to walker D K et Al 2010 tegument attention and slopped are substantive to forestall force per unit area sore. Keeping fight champion is of import for the patient`s at hazard. moreover inordinate of starchy and waterlessness can sectionalization the hide`s opposition. Wherever wet is present, it is of import to clean the part exhaustively. Patients identified at hazard should be bathed one time a xxiv hours. PH balanced cleansing agent is used to nurture the tegument from wet and waterlessness, it is a immanent protection mechanism of a tegument. When cleansing the skin day-to-day or in the presence of wet, it is required non to utilize utmost force or c lash. Eventhough wet can non be hold backled, use of goods and services skin barriers to protect tegument from wet. Dry tegument besides need to be prevented by utilizing a pH-balanced moisturizer.\r\nThe surveies conducted by saleh et Al, ( 2008 ) and Lindergren et al. , ( 2002 ) testify that usage of hazard judgment gradational put over is productive in foretelling the formation of force per unit area sore ( Decubitus Ulcer ) .The surveies substantiated the amour of hazard approximation calibrated add-ins and their utility in the bar and direction of force per unit area sores. Harmonizing to Lindergren et al. , 2002 states the dependability of hazard evaluate graduated put back in the hope of force per unit area sore formation. However, the alteration conducted by saleh et Al. ( 2008 ) , argues about the decrease in the happening of clinical acquired force per unit area tonss through the regular application of hazard appraisal graduated tables. Their acquisition besi des states that smell of clinical appraisal is besides equal worthful as associate with the sensing of force per unit area sore through hazard appraisal graduated table.\r\nIn add-on, Defloor and Grypdonck, ( 2004 ) besides stated that appraisal tools have a critical function for the bar of force per unit area sore. There are many restrictions for the hazard appraisal tools which may micturate to supply nonsensical positive military issues. The dependability, specificity and savor of the graduated table are influenced by the preventative method applications. Nurses are utilizing a assortment of hazard appraisal tools ground on practical experience they acquired. The hazard appraisal tools are assessed by agencies of numerical tonss. The variables like degree of continency, medicines and nutritionary position will mete out an mean mark for the hazard patients ( Whitening, N. L. , 2009 ) . Braden graduated table is the universally used hazard appraisal graduated table which in cludes the variables like centripetal perceptual experience, activity, mobility, wet and the nutritionary position. The hazard appraisal graduated table works in such a vogue that every bit shortly as the patient admitted in the infirmary two measure paygrade is carried out within the first six hours. The two stairss include the skin appraisal and the hazard appraisal to place the possibility of formation of force per unit area sore ( O ‘ Neil, 2004 ) . Frequent rating and appraisal should be throw away in every consequent rating at every 12 hours on patients who are at high hazard.In the same manner patients who are at low hazard besides needs to be evaluate practically to detect or to place any new hazard factors and supplying suited preventative steps ( O ‘ Neil, 2004 ) .\r\nThe most normally used tool measuring the force per unit area sore in U.K is the Waterlow force per unit area ulcer hazard appraisal tool. And it is user friendly and recommended by the nurse s in U.K. Pancorbo-hidalgo et Al. ( 2006 ) , suggests that the Waterlow force per unit area ulcer hazard appraisal tool has good force per unit area sore thinking ability and sensitiveness which may ensue to acquire incorrect positive consequences. With the waterlow force per unit area ulcer hazard assessment tool among the seven assessment surveies conducted by pancorbo-hidalgo, P.L. et Al. ( 2006 ) they got merely few produceings with corrects values.\r\nBergstorm et Al. ( 2001 ) agrees that hazard appraisal is done by graduated tables like Braden graduated table or the Norton graduated table in the infirmaries which is more dependable. However there is no universally accepted hazard appraisal tool to be adopted to forestall force per unit area sore. Besides this, the use of the hazard appraisal tools has their ain bounds in clinical systems. Alternatively, Saleh et Al. ( 2008 ) argues that medical discernment is successful as hazard appraisal tools to find the suited to be deli vered. Nevertheless, Pancorbo-Hidalgo et Al, ( 2006 ) Braden and Norton graduated tables were discover to be good once more at hazard computation than the scientific opinions. On the other manus, harmonizing to NICE guidelines ( 2003 ) hazard appraisal tools can merely be used as an aide-memoire and should non replace clinical judgement.\r\nNormal supply of O and foods are indispensable for the tissues, to appreciation wellness. ( Gottrup 2004 ) . When patients sitting or lying, the force per unit area signifier peculiar portion of the organic structure consequences in the lessening of O causes force per unit area sore ( Defloor 2005 ) . The survey conducted by Kaitani et al. , 2010, Vanderwee et al. , 2007 and Pearson et al. , 2010 reveals the importance of altering the place for the bed ridden or immobilise patient in forestalling force per unit area sore happening. Their surveies evidenced the effectivity of chemise in regular intervals among the vulnerable patients. displac e is considered as an intelligent control method against force per unit area sores ( decubitus ulcer ) . Harmonizing to Vanderwee et al. , ( 2007 ) the effectivity of force of force per unit area greater in sideway place. He besides suggested that supine place is the comfy place to cut mass the consequence of force per unit area on the pointless prominence. The experiment conducted by Vanderwee et Al. ( 2007 reveals that more regular displace does non really diminish the happening of force per unit area sore. But he recognizes that turning of patients is an hard-hitting preventative method. The relative relative relative incidence of force per unit area ulcer is more in patients who are lying down in side manner place. The hazard has been reduced when the patients are lying down in supine place.\r\nOn the other manus the survey conducted by Peterson et Al. ( 2010 ) argues that the effectivity of shifting is less or non dependable even though it is done by any experient nurse . And he prime that after guardianship an appropriate force per unit area downstairs 33 millimeter of Hg cut down the incidence of force per unit area ulcer. He states that by making this there is still fortune of happening force per unit area sore in the hazard countries. While turning the patient they are non droping the all countries prone to coerce consequence with the tegument. Even though the criterion methods for forestalling force per unit area sores are maintained the tegument dislocation go oning as the hazard countries are non relieved from force per unit area. The survey conducted by Kaitani et Al. ( 2010 ) evidenced that patients enduring from force per unit area sore have done merely a fewer alteration of placement and turning. In their surveies they states that they did nt noticed any patients with force per unit area sore who has been changed their place often in a regular intervals.\r\nFrom the findings of Hobbs ( 2004 ) besides reveals that there is no diminut ion of incidence in force per unit area sore in the infirmary due to the everyday displace on older people. Similarly Peterson et al 2010 found that still the incidence of force per unit area ulcer are increasing in the clinical scenes where precedent turning of patients has already been done. In EPUAP guidelines ( 2009 ) , suggests that shifting is an effectual method which will diminish the bound and happening of force per unit area over susceptible points like sacrum, heels, cubituss and dorsum of the caput bony prominences. However, there was no research survey conducted by any research workers to cipher the clip riddle needed to turn the patient that means there is no drive of turning intervals from any old surveies or researches.\r\nIt is really of import to inspect the musical accompaniment uprise while making shifting. Patient mustiness(prenominal) be repositioned in regularity after inspecting the tissue viability, call uping degree, medical status and rating of sk in unity. It is besides subjected by the bear outive surface So shifting can cut down the incidence of force per unit area sore to an extent. In infirmaries and wellness attention places it is suggested that shifting to be done in every 4 hours and by the usage of air mattress the incidence of the happening of force per unit area sore can be prevented. numerous of the patient ‘s feels really discomfort while turning often, to avoid frequent turning force per unit area cut downing rear surfaces can be used to alleviate force per unit area.\r\nImportantly force per unit area alleviating support surface devices has critical function in the bar of force per unit area. Harmonizing to Cullum et al. , 2001 it is divided into two, low tech devices and high tech devices. Low tech devices are soothing support surface to penetrate the organic structure weight over an country whereas high devices are bound support surface where inflatable cells consecutively inflate and deflate.\r\n Harmonizing to Lewis M, et Al ( 2003 ) if the patients memory a moderate to high possibility of exploitation force per unit area sore, dynamic support surfaces include a big cell jumping force per unit area mattress, a low air loss or air fluidized bed, or other force per unit area redistributing systems can be recommended. In a survey conducted by Nixon et Al ( 2006 ) found that in operating tabular arraies, specialise froth mattress sheathings are effectual to cut down the incidence of postoperative force per unit area sores while in other scenes, specialized froth and sheathings were the lone surfaces that were invariably better to standard infirmary mattresses in cut downing incidence of force per unit area ulcers. To diminish the cope with between bony prominences and support surfaces, pillows and froths are used. In add-on to that for cut downing the clash and shear harm, raising devices such as slide sheets, slings or arms can be used to work the patients.\r\nOn the othe r manus, it is ill-defined about the curtilage for the advantages of higher-specification changeless low-pressure and alternating-pressure support surfaces for forestalling force per unit area sores. However, there is clinical grounds of a difference in hazard of create force per unit area ulcers when utilizing high-specification froth mattresses, compared to standard infirmary mattresses. ( Nice 2005 ) Decisions for force per unit area alleviating device should find at hazard appraisal. It must include degree of hazard, comfort, patient`s penchants, usual wellness and timing of the surgery..The surveies conducted by Holm et Al. ( 2007 ) and Ferguson et Al. ( 2000 ) evidenced the deduction of nutrition in force per unit area ulcer bar. This survey suggests that older people are largely affected due to coerce ulcer. This is because of their less skin unity and low nutritionary position. The nutritionary position of the aged people is normally link with the degree of consumption of nutrient and fluids along with assort nursing intercession methods ( Holm et al. , 2007 ) . vigilance of force per unit area sore and its intervention closely colligate with the clients nutritionary position. The people with less nutritionary position have a high hazard of happening of force per unit area ulcer. The nutritionary position of the patient has to be assessed by the nurse ab initio. Adequate measure of proteins, Calories, minerals, vitamins and fluids are necessary to keep the tegument unity and lesion healing publicity ( Ferguson et al. , 2000 ) .\r\nThe progression and direction of force per unit area sore extremely influenced by their nutritionary position. For making an successful preventative steps it is indispensable to carried out with comely nutritionary rating techniques and planning ( Ferguson et al. , 2000 ) .pressure sore and nutritionary position are closely tie in to from distributively one other and are straight relative to each other.patients w ho are with less nutritionary position or malnourished are likely to be more prone to develop force per unit area sore ( Thomas, 1997 ) .To cut down the incidence both dietitians and nurses should work jointly.\r\nTo measure the nutritionary position of the patient and the degree of undernourishment and proper planning and intercessions to be done to better the position if unequal ( Ferguson et al. , 2000 ) .According to EPUAP ( 2009 ) passport every wellness attention system should make testing and rating trials of the nutritionary degree of the vulnerable people who are at hazard of force per unit area sore.\r\nPressure sore in bulk instances are preventable and governable. A targeted control step is far better than indicating on treatment antecedently recognized force per unit area sores. Preventive steps to fraudulences ( force per unit area ) sore saves clip and money. By making an effectual preventative techniques can besides understate the loss of energy and decrease in the w ork burden over the wellness attention bringing force ‘s and staffs chiefly nurses.\r\nBergstrom N. , Braden B. , Kemp M. , Champagne M. & A ; deep red E. ( 1998 ) Predicting Pressure ulcer hazard. A multisite survey of the prognostication cogency of the Braden graduated table.\r\nNursing Research. 47 ( 5 ) , p.261-26\r\nBergstrom N, Braden B. A prospective survey of force per unit area sore hazard among institutionalised elderly. J Am Geriatric S\r\nBennett G, Dealey C, Posnett J. The cost of force per unit area ulcers in the UK. Age aging 2004 ; 33:230-5\r\nCullum N, Nelson EA, Nixon J ( 2000 ) Pressure sores. clinical indorse: 979-98\r\nDefloor, T. and Grypdonck, M. F. ( 2004 ) Validation of force per unit area ulcer hazard appraisal graduated tables: a review. diary of Advanced Nursing. 48 ( 6 ) , p. 613-621.\r\nDefloor T, De Bacquer D, Grypdonck MH. The consequence of assorted combinations of turning and force per unit area cut downing devices on the incidence of force per unit area ulcers. International diary of Nursing scatteries 2005 ; 42 ( 1 ) :37-46.\r\nEuropean Pressure Ulcer consultive Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel ( 2009 ) force per unit area Ulcer Prevention Quick Reference Guide. NPtJAP, Washington DC.\r\nFerguson, M. , Cook, A. , Rimmasch, H. , Bender, S. and Voss, A. ( 2000 ) Pressure ulcer direction: the importance of nutrition. MEDSURG Nursing, 9 ( 4 ) .\r\nGottrup F. ( 2004 ) Oxygen in lesion healing and infection. World diary of Surgery ; 28 ( 3 ) :312-5.\r\nGray, J.E.Enoch, S.Harding, K.G. ( 2006 ) ABC of go against healing.Pressure ulcers.British medical journal.332.p.472-476\r\nHolm, B. , Mesh, L. , and Ove, H. ( 2007 ) . Importance of nutrition for aged individuals with force per unit area ulcers or a exposure of force per unit area ulcers: a arrogant reappraisal. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25 ( 1 ) , p. 77-84.\r\nJones I, Tweed C, Marron M ( 2001 ) A Pressure country attention in ba bies and kids: Nimbus Paediatric System.A Br J NursA 10 ( 12 ) : 789-95.\r\nKaitani, T. , Tokunaga, K. , Matsui, N. and Sanada, H. ( 2010 ) . Hazard factors related to the study of force per unit area ulcers in the critical attention scenes. Journal of clinical Nursing, 19, 414-421.\r\nLewis, M. , Pearson, A. , Ward, C. ( 2003 ) Pressure ulcer bar and intervention: Transforming research findings into consensus based clinical guidelines. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9, p.92-102.\r\nLindgren, M. , Unosson, M. and Krantz, A. M. ( 2002 ) A hazard appraisal graduated table for the anticipation of force per unit area sore development: dependability and cogency. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 38, p.190-199.\r\nLyder, C. , Yu C, Stevenson, D. , Mangat, R. , Empleo- Frazier, O. , Emerling, J. and McKay J. Validating the Braden carapace for the anticipation of force per unit area ulcer hazard in inkinesss and Latino/Hispanic seniors: a pilot survey ( 1998 ) . Ostomy Wound Manage . 44 ( 3A ) p.42S-49S.\r\nMurdoch V ( 2002 ) A Pressure attention in the pediatric attention unit.A Nursing standardA 17 ( 6 ) : 71-6\r\nNational Institute for Clinical Excellence. ( 2003 ) Pressure ulcer bar. Clinical guideline 7.\r\nNix DP. Support surfaces. In: Bryant R, Nix D, eds. Acute & A ; Chronic Wounds: online Management Concepts. 3rd erectile dysfunction. St Louis MO: Mosby ; 2007:235-248.\r\nNixon, J. , Nelson, E.A. , Cranny, G. , Iglesias, C.P. , Hawkins, K. , Cullum, N.A. , Philips, A. , Splisbury, K. , Dorgerson, D.J. , Mason, S.,2006b. Pressure alleviating support surfaces: a randomized rating. Health Technology estimate 10 ( 22 )\r\nNakagami G. , Sakai K. , Matsui N. , Sanada H. , Kitagawa A. , Tadaka E. and Sugama\r\nJ. ( 2008 ) Validation and finding of the feeling country of the KINOTEX detector to\r\ndevelop a new mattress with an porthole pressure-sensing system. Life science\r\nNational Pressure Ulce Advisory Panel ( NPUAP ) ( 2007, February ) .A Pres sure ulcer description and phases. Retrieved 4/13/2007, fromA hypertext transfer protocol: //www.npuap.org\r\nPancorbo-Hidalgo, P. L. , Garcia-Fernandez, F. P. , Lopez-Medina, I. M. and Alvarez- Nieto, C. ( 2006 ) fortune appraisal graduated tables for force per unit area ulcer bar: a systematic reappraisal. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 54, p. 94-110.\r\nPeterson, J. M. , Schwab, W. , Oostrom, V. H. J. , Gravenstein, N.and Caruso, J. L. ( 2010 ) . Consequence of turning on skin-bed interface in healthy grownups. Journal of advanced Nursing, 66 ( 7 ) , p. 1556-1564.\r\nPieper B. Mechanical forces: force per unit area, shear, and clash. In: Bryant R, Nix D, eds. Acute & A ; Chronic Wounds: Current Management Concepts. 3rd erectile dysfunction. St Louis, MO: Mosby ; 2007:205-234.\r\nRycroft-Malone J and McInnes EA ( 2000 ) Pressure ulcer hazard appraisal and prevention-technical study London, A Royal College of Nursing\r\nSaleh, M. , Anthony, D. and Parboteeah, S. ( 2009 ) . The impact of force per unit area ulcer hazard appraisal on patient results among hospitalised patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 18, p. 1923-1929\r\nSchoonhoven, L. , Haalboom, J, R, E. , Bousema, M, T. , Algra, A. , Grobbee, D, E. , Grypdonck, M, H. , Buskens, E. ( 2002 ) future cohort survey of everyday usage of hazard appraisal graduated tables for anticipation of force per unit area ulcers. BMJ, 325, p.1-5.\r\nSinclair, L. , Berwiczonek, H. and Thurston, N. ( 2004 ) Evaluation of an grounds\r\nbased commandment plan for force per unit area ulcer bar. Journal of Wound, Ostomy,\r\nand Continence Nursing. 31 ( 1 ) , p. 43-50.\r\nTannen A, Dassen T, Bours G, Halfens RJG. A comparing of force per unit area ulcers prevalence: concerted informations aggregation in the Netherlands and Germany. Int J Nurs Stud 2004 ; 41:607-12\r\nThomas, D. R. The function of nutrition in bar and healing of force per unit area ulcers. ( 1997 ) . Clinical Geriatric Medicine. 13, p. 497-511.\r\nVanderw ee, K. , Grypdonck, M. and Defloor, T. ( 2007 ) Non-blanchable erythema as an index for the demand for force per unit area ulcer bar: a randomized-controlled test Journal of Clinical Nursing.16, p.325-335.\r\nWalker D K, Sell S V, Kindred C. ( 2010 ) Pressure Ulcer Prevention Utilizing Unlicensed Assistive Personnel Crit finagle Nurs Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 348-355\r\nWhitening, N.L. ( 2009 ) Skin appraisal of patients at hazard of force per unit area ulcers. Nursing Standard. 24 ( 10 ) , p.40-44.\r\nWhittington, K. , Patrick, M. , Roberts, J, L. ( 2000 ) A national survey of force per unit area ulcer prevalence and incidence in ague attention infirmaries. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence, 27, p. 209-215.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment