Friday, December 14, 2018

'Human Rights or Technology? Essay\r'

'In today’s passing technological world all(prenominal)one wants the latest and greatest thingamabob on the market. Companies like apple, want to make as much funds as possible. With both orchard apple tree and society world held liable for the outrageous work conditions in the factories in china players digest be treat much like the great unwashed.\r\nIn the expression â€Å"In chinaware, kind Costs atomic number 18 built into an iPad,” Charles Duhigg and David Barboza argue that orchard apple tree and society ar trusty for the repugnant conditions in China. In this article, the authors use facts, person-to-person experience and a story nearly a worker from one of apple’s factories, do the article more than interesting and personal to the reader. large-minded personal backg rape brings you into the story. The article non unaccompanied addresses the operative conditions, only if in any case discusses the alimentation conditions. Without big(p) specific examples, orchard apple tree and society claim to labor a closer look and be held responsible for the horrendous conditions in China.\r\nIn an essay indite by Namit Arora, he discusses his own experience astir(predicate) his socioeconomic status. Arora writes that whitethornbe it was non ascribable to his baffling work, but that he was in the right put up at the right time. Arora describes different types of economic umpire and makes the reader think about what we be. Do you deserve to charter everything handed to you because you come from a bass family or should your hard and diligent work experience you that reward; this is the very topic of Arora’s essay.\r\nThe alliance between the article written by Duhigg and Barboza with that of Arora is that of basal rights as a human universe. If the rich argon do richer in dramatic play makes the poor sprain poorer. No matter what we do there very will never be a truly fair or just way t o go around an preservation. There will always be those that devolve their non being case-hardened fairly all the equal if everything is spoon fed to them, there just needfully to be more balance to our current systems. Arora’s essay talks about those that be innate(p) with natural abilities from a moral standpoint is the same as those that have silver spoons in their mouths. Arora also discusses the â€Å"Difference Principle” which deals with this natural lottery.\r\nFirst off, Duhigg and Barboza discuss what we as consumers want. â€Å"Customers want amazing sensitive electronics delivered every year.” (Duhigg and Barboza) This means the customers don’t c atomic number 18 about how the products ar made or who is hurt during the manufacturing process. During the short letter of the interviews Duhigg and Barboza conducted, a former worker told them that apple did non care about anything except make more products and lowering costs to make those items. People who deprave these products are blinded by the technology bug. If consumers did not want the latest and greatest phones or some other electronic devices, there would not be as high of a need to for Apple to kick downstairs the cheapest suppliers.\r\nWorking conditions are not the only issues for the workers in these factories. The living conditions in China are horrific-there are more people living in their apartments hence is safe by any standard. There were numerous people committing suicide cod to the conditions at the factories. Apple is one of the most sought after brands. So if Apple were to make some changes it could make authoritative strides at reducing the working and living issues in China. If society were to inquire about how the workers are being treated this could also lead to changes being made in favor of the employees. Apple would be more likely to actually take action reconcile these substandard conditions, since no society wants their d irty washables to be aired outside the company.\r\nSecond, as discussed by Duhigg and Barboza, Apple is evidenceing to make things best(p), but people would still be disgusted with what was seen. Duhigg and Barboza write that these devices are produced in substandard labor conditions, which is according to workers, worker advocates and reports published by companies themselves. There are minor(ip) workers and in many cases earn little to no money at all. In today’s society we need to take a round turn and prevent these children and other workers not turn back used and abused. Although Apple says it is driveing to make things better there has been former workers say â€Å"finding new suppliers is time-consuming and costly,” Duhigg and Barboza report.\r\nSince Apple is an American based company the standards of the United States should be imposed on not just Apple, but any company that try to exploit these lower standards of other countries. As with society, we nee d to stop thinking of the things we want, but how and who is affected by making these products. If a company knows about issues but does nothing to correct those issues before someone were to bring in hurt they are just as responsible if not more responsible because something could have been through to prevent those injuries. â€Å"Apple had been alerted to hazardous conditions inside the Chengdu plan.” (Duhigg and Barboza)\r\nThis shows that Apple is aware of conditions at their supplier but are taking no actions because as long as Apple gets its products the injuries of workers are none of their concern. Apple workers need to not only have better working conditions but also have better living conditions. This is not due to the fact that Apple has the money to pay their workers more; it’s actually due to the fact that the workers are human beings and should be compensate better. As well as having living conditions that are safer and healthier.\r\nThe opportunity co sts in China are significantly lower in China. The workers in China are willing to earn pennies on the dollar. From Apple’s standpoint it just makes sense to have their factory in China, instead of the United States. Apple has become one of the largest companies in their field due to these countries with lower standards. Even though Apple may make it seem like these conditions are not approved of, they would not be the electronic position house they are today. Arora discusses people may wishing opportunity due to their lower or sociable economic status.\r\nIn China the lack of opportunity does not play as much as it does in the U.S., since a company in China hires workers of almost any age. The downfall for those workers is getting treated as less than a human being as more like part of a machine. This is just morally wrong, for Apple to just turn a blind eye to these conditions. If Apple very cared these conditions could be better.\r\nThe conditions may not be up to the s tandards of the U.S. but these people could actually be treated like a person. Due to the lower economy of China and the low opportunity cost, these two go hand-in-hand. Apple is taking all the risk and should be compensated for their risks. Even if we try to uphold higher(prenominal) standards there really is not much which can be done. No matter how much we try there will always be a country that has lower standards and cheaper workers; companies will just go to those places which makes profits the highest.\r\nTo conclude, society as a whole needs to change our mind set from not caring how we get our products towards caring about how the products we taint are produced. As far as Apple goes, Apple needs to be held responsible not only for how the products are produced, but also how the workers making their products are being treated.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nArora, Namit â€Å"What Do We deserve?” Emerging Contemporary Readings for Writers Composition Subjects Ed. Barclay Barrios . Bedford/St. Martins, 2010, 87-91. Book. Duhigg, Charles, and Barboza, David â€Å"In China, Human Costs are Built Into an iPad” The New York Times, 25 Jan. 2012. Editorial.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment