CAUSAL ARGUMENT ONAFFIRMATIVE ACTION2005Inequalities , unfairness , racial separation , and separationism , to separate a few , are common dustup that we much hear in our daily activities to describe the rest in treating one to another . The inequalities might come in motley forms and it happens not solitary(prenominal) in the working surroundings (offices , firms , etc ) but in any case in our homes when we love our daughters than boys or in education validations when we select students based on ethnicity rather than on the capability , for in military positionConcerning the race in education system , the U .S . Supreme administration on June 23 , 2003 yieldd a bank decision involving admissions policies at the University of Michigan and its law indoctrinate that stand have far-reaching implications for American h igh education for years to comeIn pas de deux decisions involving the cases of Gratz v . Bollinger and Grutter v . Bollinger , the supreme apostrophize not just upheld racial and ethnic diversity as a nominate state interest at the University of Michigan but as well as reaffirm the importance of giving whole colleges and universities flexibility in the admissions process University of Michigan and Affirmative serve , 2003In Grutter , it upheld the law instill program that sought a critical mass of minorities by a 5 to 4 vote , with Justice Sandra 24 arcminutes O Connor siding with the majority to decide the case . The tribunal split six to three in Gratz to find the undergraduate program unconstitutional , with Chief Justice William H . Rehnquist pen the majority opinion come University of Michigan and Affirmative follow up , 2003The question of the legality of the University of Michigan s affirmative fulfill policies has f each(prenominal) out the nation s r esign because its opponents are arguing that! the programs are hinder because they violate federal law which applies equ bothy in all states within the U .S . It is the University of Michigan s position that its policies are licit and that they are the best options available to it for increasing diversity in higher education .
Even if the University of Michigan altered its affirmative exercise policies , it would not end the argument as gigantic as other human race universities and private universities that accept federal funds maintain affirmative do programs (Fox News , 2003In this stance , we might raise two questions regarding the case of affirma tive action in the University of Michigan . First , whether the use of race issue as criterion in the admission process is steadfast valid in today s education system . hour , what kind of admission structure that meets the needs of an educational induction and the federal law in to avoid conflict with the court s prohibition against quotasConcerning the first issue , the U .S . Supreme court of law has long recognized that `education is the very foundation of copesettic citizenship . For this reason , the diffusion of knowledge and opportunity through frequent institutions of higher education must be accessible to all individuals regardless of race or ethnicity (Fox News , 2003The decisions made by the Supreme Court regarding the case of affirmative action in University of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper